Ready to take that next step toward homeownership?
- Charles "Skip" Geiser
- 2 minutes ago
- 3 min read
If you’ve been putting off buying a home because you thought getting approved would be too hard, know this: qualifying for a mortgage is starting to get a bit more achievable, but lending standards are still strong
.
Lenders are making it slightly easier for well-qualified buyers to access financing, which is opening more doors for people ready to make a move.
So, if strict requirements were holding you back, this shift could be the opportunity you’ve been waiting for, without repeating the risky lending practices that led to the housing crash back in 2008.
Lenders Are Opening More Doors
Banks are offering credit to more people in an effort to boost activity in the housing market, including buyers who have lower credit scores or smaller down payments. And that means more people are getting approved for mortgages.
But it doesn’t mean we’re heading for another crash like 2008. Even with the slight easing lately, lending standards today are still much tighter than they were back then.
According to the Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA), the Mortgage Credit Availability Index (MCAI) has been going up. This index shows how easy or hard it is for people to get a mortgage.
When the index rises, it means banks are easing their lending standards. And in May, credit availability hit its highest point in almost three years (see graph below):
Why does this matter to you? It means you may now be able to qualify for a mortgage that you wouldn’t have just a few months ago. The National Association of Underwriters (NAMU) explains:
“Mortgage credit availability surged in May, reaching its highest level since August 2022. The uptick signals that lenders are increasingly willing to loosen underwriting standards, providing borrowers with greater access to financing options . . .”
But What About 2008?
Now, you might be thinking, “Didn’t looser lending standards play a role in the 2008 housing crash?” That’s a smart question – and an important one. But here’s the difference. While credit availability is rising, lending standards are still under control.
Based on MCAI data going all the way back to 2004, today’s lending levels are still way below what they were leading up to the housing bubble (see graph below):
So, increasing mortgage credit availability right now isn’t a concern. It’s just a good thing for anyone looking to buy a home. As Brett Hively, SVP of Mortgage, Finance, and Strategy at Ameris Bancorp, recently said:
“This uptick is opening the door for many borrowers to move forward with a home purchase or a refinance program.”
Bottom Line
So, if you’ve been holding back because you thought you couldn’t get approved for a mortgage, it’s worth finding out what’s possible today. Let’s talk with a lender about your options and see if you’re ready to take that next step toward homeownership.
Today's Pensacola Realtors MLS Information
Today's Active Homes For Sale
Escambia and Santa Rosa County
3290 ^ (9)
Above $600,000
715 ^ (8)
Between $500,000 - $599,999
214 v (2)
Between $400,000 - $499,999
419 ^ (2)
Between $300,000 - $399,999
848 v (20)
Between $200,000 - $299,999
788 ^ (15)
Between $100,000 - $199,999
267 ^ (6)
Under $99,999
40
RED is UP Black Remained the Same Green is DOWN
Current Mortgage Rate
30 YR Fixed 6.79% (+.04.%) 15 YR Fixed 5.99% (+.01%)
Current Mortgage Rates
Florida
SkipSOLDMyHome.com with
Plum Tree Real Estate Marketing
850.221.6442
Alabama
SkipSOLDMyHome.com with
Rob Brooks Realty
850.221.6442
Start
Cary Schmidt's Introduction of Done
This article provides information and opinions but is not meant as investment advice. Skip Geiser LLC, Charles "Skip" Geiser or Plum Tree Real Estate Marketing does not assure the accuracy or completeness of the information or opinions presented here. It is important to conduct your own research, due diligence, and seek professional advice before making any investment decisions. Skip Geiser LLC, Charles "Skip" Geiser or Plum Tree Real Estate Marketing is not responsible for any loss or damage resulting from relying on the information or opinions in this article.